Cllr Moran,
I am not usually minded
to write and express views to local councillors, but after reading your
comments in this week's Nantwich Guardian (October 1), I would like to
make the following comment:
While taking your
point about the Nantwich Walled Garden Society having to compromise with
the developers or end up with nothing, I would have thought that the
"nothing" optional was preferable.
My point is that the
compromise would leave Nantwich with a well-preserved Elizabethan garden
wall surrounding a modern apartment block. That is not the same - nowhere
near - to the Nantwich Walled Garden Society's desired objective of a
flourishing walled garden.
No matter how good
architects might consider the building, the apartments would not be a
matter of interest to historians.
A better idea - and
this could well be a hidden agenda - would be to demolish the wall and
reconstruct a section of it somewhere else in Nantwich. Part of the
proposed tourist centre on the banks of the River Weaver, perhaps. Far
better that than the compromise proposed by councillors.
The N.W.G.S. see the
Walled Garden as a tourist attraction. How many tourists
would want to come to see a block of flats? In any case, I have seen the
garden site. It isn't huge. How will anyone get eight flats on it?
John H. Brough.
|